hi-mpg.org Ratings for
2006 Chevrolet HHR
| Price: | $16,000-23,000 (in 2006) |
| Style: | 6 |
| Performance: | 4 |
| Luxury: | 5 |
| Utility: | 10 |
| Fun: | 4 |
| Value: | 6 |
| Overall: |
5.83 |
| | Ratings scale: 1-10; 10 = best |
The styling of the Chevrolet HHR (short for Heritage High Roof) was purportedly
inspired by the 1949 Chevy Suburban. Indeed, the HHR's hemispherical
grill and squarish flared wheelwells harken back to that post-war,
working man's icon. Yet the concept of the HHR was unbashedly
"borrowed" from Chrysler's PT Cruiser,
whose runaway success in five years earlier was too much for General
Motors to ignore.
The PT formula? Take the underpinnings of a fuel-efficient car (in the HHR's case,
the Chevy Cobalt), and put on top of it a body that offered ample room for
both humans and cargo. Inject some styling cues harkening back
to the 50's hot rods (big grills, chrome door handles, etc.), all while
engineering in some nifty features like flat-folding seats, flat cargo areas,
etc. Then, as if all of that wasn't enough, slap on a price tag no higher than
most humble, insipid compact cars. How ingenious is that?
Compared to the PT Cruiser, we like the HHR's styling a little less (to us
looks too much like a slightly smaller first-generation Dodge Durango), but it does
have some advantages. First off, there are currently far less HHRs on the streets
than the PT Cruisers due to being newer. Secondly, gas mileage -- both city and highway --
is slightly better, despite having slightly larger exterior dimensions. Note, however,
the PT Cruiser actually has slightly more cargo space. The difference is academic
as both are cavernous especially with the rear seats folded down.
In fact, the PT Cruiser and HHR are perhaps the perfect antidotes to the SUV blues.
They are masculine enough for their owners to avoid being called a sissy,
and spacious enough for all one's gear. They are infinitely more fun and get
far better gas mileage. No wonder, then, we declare them both as
Hot Green Machines.
|